Evaluated screen

Factory Farming and Intensive Animal Confinement

Identifies companies and other entities that own or operate commercial terrestrial livestock or poultry production using intensive confinement systems, high stocking densities, or routine husbandry practices associated with restricted movement or material welfare risk. The factual screen records production system, species, scale, and practices; welfare rankings, certification, legal compliance and client thresholds are separate evidence or policy attributes. Processing without farming, aquaculture, generic suppliers, and operations documented as non-intensive are excluded.

Type
Evaluated
Version
2026.08.21.2
Published
Aug 21, 2026
Inclusions
6
Exclusions
6
How to read this definition

Inclusion criteria describe evidence that can establish this activity. Exclusion criteria identify circumstances that do not establish it on that basis alone. The evaluation remains connected to its taxonomy version and supporting evidence.

Can establish this activity

Included when supported

Evidence may support involvement when it matches one or more of these inclusion criteria.

6 criteria
  1. 01Criterion

    Include owners or operators of commercial terrestrial livestock or poultry facilities using intensive indoor or confined production systems.

  2. 02Criterion

    Include operations using gestation or farrowing crates, battery cages, veal crates, tethering, feedlots, or other systems that materially restrict normal movement, with the specific practice recorded.

  3. 03Criterion

    Include operations using routine physical alterations, mutilations, depopulation practices, or other husbandry practices of concern; record procedure, species, pain mitigation, and legal status as evidence attributes.

  4. 04Criterion

    Include large-scale poultry, pig, cattle, dairy, egg, or other terrestrial-animal operations using continuous or predominant high-density confinement.

  5. 05Criterion

    Include integrated meat, dairy, egg, and food companies only where they own, control, or directly operate the qualifying farming system; purchasing alone is handled through client-policy attribution rules.

  6. 06Criterion

    Include operations supported by reliable regulatory, court, audit, certification, or investigation evidence of systemic intensive-confinement or husbandry practices, provided the entity and facility are resolved.

Does not establish this activity on its own

Excluded on this basis alone

These circumstances do not establish this activity unless separate evidence also meets an inclusion criterion.

6 criteria
  1. 01Criterion

    Exclude operations documented as pasture-based, free-range, extensive, or otherwise non-intensive under the selected factual indicators; certification alone is supporting evidence rather than automatic exclusion.

  2. 02Criterion

    Exclude small-scale or traditional farms only where the available evidence establishes that they do not use the qualifying intensive systems or practices; size alone is not determinative.

  3. 03Criterion

    Exclude slaughterhouses, meatpackers, dairy processors, egg processors, food manufacturers, and retailers that do not own, control, or operate the farming activity.

  4. 04Criterion

    Do not exclude solely because an operation holds an animal-welfare certification; use the certification as evidence and evaluate the actual production system and practices.

  5. 05Criterion

    Exclude veterinary, feed, genetics, housing, equipment, technology, finance, and other suppliers without ownership, control, or operation of the farming activity.

  6. 06Criterion

    Exclude aquaculture and seafood farming from this terrestrial factory-farming screen unless a future approved screen expressly covers aquatic production systems.

Evidence and evaluation methodology

How sources, entity pathways, decisions, qualifiers, and review history are handled.

Map screens to a client policy

How to choose provider screens, document coverage, and decide what happens after an outcome.

Other screens under Animal Welfare

Taxonomy version 2026.08.21.2, published Aug 21, 2026. Material changes receive a new immutable release so earlier evaluations remain tied to the definitions and criteria used.

Animal Welfare