Definitions can hide the boundary
A screening result is difficult to use when the covered activity, exclusions, ownership treatment, or applicable version cannot be examined.
About Company Screener
Company Screener is being built for institutional investment and compliance teams that need to understand, rather than merely receive, a company screening result.
Why Company Screener exists
Investment screening often sits between policy, research, compliance, and portfolio action. Information can become difficult to explain as it passes between those teams. We want the screening record to make those connections visible.
A screening result is difficult to use when the covered activity, exclusions, ownership treatment, or applicable version cannot be examined.
Teams need to understand which entity, activity, source, and review period support a result, rather than only receive a flag.
Compliance review depends on knowing what changed, when it changed, and which information was available when a decision was made.
How we work
These principles guide both the public methodology and the logged-in workflow. They are design commitments, not claims that every planned capability is already available.
Evaluated screens should state what is included and excluded. Organizational aggregators should be clearly distinguished from screens that collect data.
Assessment records should remain connected to the relevant entity, activity, source material, source date, and review context.
Taxonomy releases, assessment changes, review notes, and superseded decisions should remain available for explanation and audit.
Evaluated companies, clients, and specialist organizations should have a clear route to provide evidence, request review, and identify possible errors.
From policy to record
Company Screener does not treat a screening flag as the end of the workflow. The useful record includes why the screen was selected, what the evidence supports, and how the organization responded.
Start with the client’s mandate, regulatory interpretation, entity scope, ownership treatment, thresholds, and required action.
Connect evidence to specific entities and activities using the applicable published screen definition.
Separate the involvement outcome from evidence qualifiers, decision notes, and any action the client chooses to take.
Open to informed challenge
Companies we evaluate can provide evidence, identify factual concerns, request a correction, or ask for a re-evaluation. A submission does not silently replace the existing record; it enters a moderated review process.
We also welcome collaboration with NGOs, researchers, and organizations with specific subject-matter knowledge. Their contribution can help improve source coverage, definitions, and the accuracy of company evaluations while keeping methodology decisions visible.
Corrections and collaborationAccountable organization
We can discuss how your current screening process works, where evidence or decision history becomes difficult to manage, and whether Company Screener is a useful fit.