Solutions for institutional screening teams

Move from policy requirement to a reviewable screening record.

Company Screener connects published screen definitions, portfolios, company evidence, ownership context, decisions, and change history for investment and compliance workflows.

Teams we support

Shared evidence, distinct responsibilities.

The same company record can support different review tasks without collapsing investment, research, compliance, and oversight responsibilities into one role.

Investment management

Review portfolios and focused company lists against relevant published screens while keeping the underlying evidence available.

  • +Portfolio-level screening overview
  • +Mandate and client-specific views
  • +Clear company and screen drill-down
Explore this solution

Compliance and legal

Connect regulatory or policy requirements to screen definitions, evidence, review notes, and a traceable decision record.

  • +Policy-to-screen mapping
  • +Evidence and review controls
  • +Change and decision history
Explore this solution

Responsible investment and research

Assess the entity, activity, ownership pathway, source quality, and qualifiers behind an involvement outcome.

  • +Source-backed company research
  • +Ownership and entity context
  • +Moderated evidence suggestions

Asset owners and oversight

Connect owner policies and mandate oversight to reviewable evidence, known gaps, institutional responses, and follow-up.

  • +Reviewable decision records
  • +Mandate and manager oversight
  • +Open exceptions and follow-up
Explore this solution

Screening work, connected

Practical solutions across the review cycle.

Each workflow keeps its inputs and history visible so teams can review the result without reconstructing the reasoning from separate spreadsheets and exports.

01

Turn policy requirements into screening scope

Start with the relevant regulation, mandate, client requirement, or internal policy. Select published screen definitions and record the scope, thresholds, ownership treatment, exceptions, and expected action used by the organization.

Read the screening policy guide
02

Upload portfolios

Import a holdings file, match available identifiers to company records, and review unresolved rows before applying the portfolio. The resulting overview separates companies with involvement identified from those with no involvement identified.

Review portfolio workflows
03

Build focused watchlists

Follow a smaller group of companies for a mandate, theme, client request, engagement program, or research priority without requiring a full portfolio upload.

See watchlist capabilities
04

Review evidence and ownership context

Trace an outcome to the company, relevant entity, activity, source material, review period, and supported ownership relationship. Keep uncertainty in evidence qualifiers instead of creating extra decision outcomes.

Review the methodology
05

Follow reviewed changes

Surface reviewed updates affecting monitored company records so the team can decide whether another review or action is needed. Intended notification channels are in-app and email, based on configured preferences.

Understand change monitoring
06

Preserve the decision record

Keep the applicable taxonomy release, evidence, rationale, review notes, suggestions, qualifiers, and superseded decisions together for internal oversight, client questions, and regulatory review.

Explore audit history

Operating model

A repeatable path from requirement to record.

Company Screener supports the information and review workflow. The organization remains responsible for approving the policy and deciding how an outcome affects investment action.

01

Define

Clarify the policy objective, covered entities, relevant activities, ownership treatment, exceptions, and required response.

02

Select

Choose the published screens and available filters that best represent the approved policy scope.

03

Review

Examine company matches, evidence, ownership relationships, qualifiers, and unresolved questions.

04

Record

Document the decision, preserve its context, and revisit it when reviewed information changes.

Capability boundaries

Configuration changes the view, not the research record.

Screen selection

Clients select from published screen definitions and available options. Selecting a screen or filter does not create a new screen or silently change its inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Ownership treatment

Reliable ownership percentages can be shown as evidence context. Client filters do not recalculate the underlying company assessment using a client-specific ownership threshold.

Change monitoring

Monitoring is intended to surface reviewed changes. It does not silently replace an existing decision. Coverage, frequency, and delivery depend on the configured service.

A useful fit when

The screening answer needs to be explained later.

Multiple mandates or client requirements need distinct views.

Entity and ownership relationships affect whether an activity is in scope.

Research, compliance, and investment teams share a review process.

Decisions must remain understandable after sources or outcomes change.

Start with the process you have today.

Bring an existing policy, portfolio workflow, screening-provider output, or audit-trail problem. We can map where Company Screener may help and where responsibility remains with your team.

Request a demonstration