Evaluated screen

Animal Testing for Non-Medical Products

Identifies companies and other entities that conduct, commission, or control animal testing for cosmetics, personal-care products, household products, chemicals, or other non-medical consumer or industrial products. Whether the testing is voluntary, legally required, required by a customer, or performed by a supplier must be recorded as evidence rather than used to create a separate factual activity screen. Medical-product testing, non-animal methods, distribution without testing control, and verified no-testing operations are excluded.

Type
Evaluated
Version
2026.08.21.2
Published
Aug 21, 2026
Inclusions
6
Exclusions
4
How to read this definition

Inclusion criteria describe evidence that can establish this activity. Exclusion criteria identify circumstances that do not establish it on that basis alone. The evaluation remains connected to its taxonomy version and supporting evidence.

Can establish this activity

Included when supported

Evidence may support involvement when it matches one or more of these inclusion criteria.

6 criteria
  1. 01Criterion

    Include entities that conduct, commission, fund, or control animal tests for cosmetics, personal-care products, ingredients, or formulations.

  2. 02Criterion

    Include entities that conduct, commission, fund, or control animal tests for household, cleaning, chemical, industrial, or other non-medical products.

  3. 03Criterion

    Include outsourced or supplier-performed testing where the evaluated entity requests, specifies, pays for, relies on, or retains decision-making control over the animal study.

  4. 04Criterion

    Include non-medical animal testing regardless of whether the jurisdiction permits alternatives; record the legal requirement and alternative-method status separately.

  5. 05Criterion

    Include involvement supported by reliable company disclosure, regulatory records, study records, supplier documentation, or credible investigation that identifies the entity and testing role.

  6. 06Criterion

    Include animal testing conducted to satisfy a mandatory non-medical regulatory or legal requirement; record the governing requirement and jurisdiction as evidence rather than treating it as a separate activity screen.

Does not establish this activity on its own

Excluded on this basis alone

These circumstances do not establish this activity unless separate evidence also meets an inclusion criterion.

4 criteria
  1. 01Criterion

    Exclude testing whose documented purpose is development, safety assessment, or regulatory approval of human pharmaceuticals, biologics, vaccines, or medical devices; classify it under Animal Testing for Medical Products.

  2. 02Criterion

    Exclude in vitro, in silico, organoid, human-cell, microphysiological, clinical, observational, and other non-animal methods.

  3. 03Criterion

    Exclude retailers, distributors, licensors, and brand owners that neither conduct nor commission testing and lack control over testing decisions, unless supplier-testing attribution is separately established under the client policy.

  4. 04Criterion

    Exclude current involvement where reliable evidence establishes that the relevant products and operations use no animal testing; preserve any verified historical testing separately.

Evidence and evaluation methodology

How sources, entity pathways, decisions, qualifiers, and review history are handled.

Map screens to a client policy

How to choose provider screens, document coverage, and decide what happens after an outcome.

Other screens under Animal Welfare

Taxonomy version 2026.08.21.2, published Aug 21, 2026. Material changes receive a new immutable release so earlier evaluations remain tied to the definitions and criteria used.

Animal Welfare